July 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2004

Wed, Jul.07.2004:10:55 AM

Stage 4: Cambrai-Arras

07-07-04.stage4.gif

07-07-04.postalfinish.jpgUS Postal dominated the team time trial today, the results say it all:

1. U.S. Postal, 1:12:03
2. Phonak, at 1:07
3. Illes Balears, at 1:15
4. T-Mobile, at 1:19
5. CSC, at 1:45
6. Rabobank, at 1:53
7. Liberty Seguros, at 2:25
8. Euskaltel - Euskadi, at 2:35
9. Saeco, at 2:35
10. Alessio - Bianchi, at 2:57

Due to recent rule changes, the second place team only loses 20' to US Postal, the third place team 30', and so on, so Armstrong won't put that much time into Hamilton (20') or Ullrich (40'), but he did gain enough time to put on the yellow jersey for the first time in this year's Tour. It will be interesting to see how long he holds onto it.

This year's TTT was fairly messy due to the onset of rain close to the start time. Phonak had multiple problems, including five tire punctures and three dropped riders. They still managed to ride into second place with only the minimum five riders. US Postal had to drop Noval, who may have still been suffering from yesterday's crash but still managed to finish in time to stand on the podium with his teammates. CSC also seemed to have multiple problems with at least one crash; they should still be sitting fairly well in the overall team standings. T-Mobile also appeared to have problems.

Postal wins Tour team time trial Armstrong in yellow (VeloNews)
Stage 4 Photo Gallery (Graham Watson)
Tour de France: The Jambon Report - Stage 4 (Daily Peloton)


Comments
Subscribe to comments (coming soon): rss comments netnewswire bloglines Shrook My Yahoo!
Post a comment
NOTICE: Comments are encouraged, but I reserve the right to remove any comment that is offtopic or spam.

Privacy: E-mail addresses are not required, but if you make a request it will allow me to contact you directly. Your e-mail address will not be displayed on this site and it will not be shared.









Remember personal info?