kwc.org Photos Spare Cycles MythBusters

They're here: 70-200 f/2.8 and 1.4x

New Toy (the bigger one)

Two new toys arrived in the mail for me today: the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS USM and the Canon 1.4x extender. I've long been eying these as additions to my cycling photography arsenal, but I didn't view myself as 'worthy' of them at the start. Actually, price was probably more a factor. With the Tour of Missouri coming up, I figured now was the time to take the pocketbook plunge.

Experience matters for photography, but let's not kid ourselves. The person with the more expensive equipment will take better photos, at least for sports photography, where your photos have to been in focus to qualify. I took cycling photos for years with a film and analog Rebel, but it was the Canon 30D that immediately took things to the next level.

I'm hoping for the same sort of results with the 70-200 f/2.8 IS and 1.4x combo. The image stabilization in the 70-200 f/2.8 IS has a specific mode for doing panning photography, which is a popular staple of cycling photography (example). The extra advantage of the f/2.8 should also help in darker conditions, which my old 70-200 f/4 suffers in. One other bonus: weather sealing, which matters when you're trying to run around with a plastic baggie trying to keep the rain out.

As for the 1.4x, it's my compromise. It's been recommended to me that I pick up a 300mm lens, and there's been no lack of them at the finishing line of events that I visit. A 200mm isn't long enough in those situations and a 300mm collapses the depth of field better. Unfortunately, a 300mm requires man-of-steel arms to lug around. I've seen a photographer leave his 300mm in the media van rather than lug it around the course.

A 1.4x is cheaper and lighter. It will turn my 70-200 f/2.8 into a 98-280 f/4, which should fit the bill (an extender affects both the focal length and aperture). I was always worried that 1.4x or 2x extender would slow down my old f/4 lens too much, but the f/2.8 provides that extra breathing room.

I'll have several occasions in September to break the new equipment in. Hopefully it will perform well. In any case, it's another step towards guaranteeing that I never make money off of photography.

70200_28lis_usm.jpg canon14.jpg

Comments (4)

I rented a 70-200F2.8L IS. I really really liked it.

Next thing you know you'll be ordering a 1DMkIII or 1DMkIIN...

Good luck!

Holy Moley, Ken. That's some seriously nice glass.

Do extenders and IS play well together?

kwc:

IS supposedly functions normally, but I will have to see how much it degrades the image quality. Now that I've got some super glass I'm going to have to play for real.

I shoot cycling photography with the same equipment and while I own the 1.4x I don't really use it much since I've found it to dramatically reduce the sharpness of the photos I take with it.

Nice shots from the race.

Post a comment


tags.

related entries.

what is this?

This page contains a single entry from kwc blog posted on August 29, 2007 8:59 PM.

The previous post was Looj? Really?.

The next post is Online demo of seam-based image resizing.

Current entries can be found on the main page.